Política

[Politica][bleft]

Inmigración

[Inmigración][twocolumns]

Wall Street Journal: Will El Salvador Veer Left?

Wishes for peace on Earth are on the lips of the faithful throughout Latin America this week. But in El Salvador, these hopeful sentiments mask trepidation about what 2009 will bring. (Photo AFP)

The fears stem from the fact that the former guerrilla group Farabundo Marti Front for National Liberation -- aka the FMLN -- is now leading in the opinion polls for the March 15 presidential elections. FMLN candidate Mauricio Funes is widely considered a moderate leftist. But other party honchos -- including vice-presidential candidate Salvador Sánchez Cerén -- are of the more traditional (i.e., militant) FMLN variety. Many Salvadorans are worried that if the party comes to power, its radicalized elements will overwhelm the likes of Mr. Funes and pull the country hard to the left.

This would be tragic for the tiny, market-oriented Central American nation, which suffered so much in the 1980s at the hands of the Soviet-backed FMLN. Yet if the FMLN wins the election, don't blame Hugo Chávez, Fidel Castro or neighboring Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, who still fly the revolution's tattered banner.



Instead, look to Salvadoran President Elias Antonio Saca of the center-right Arena Party. Mr. Saca was in Washington last week promising President Bush Salvadoran help in fighting the U.S. "war on drugs" and trying to pass himself off as a champion of traditional American economic values. But back home in El Salvador, his actions have earned him a reputation for undermining democratic capitalism through the abrogation of contracts.

Take the case of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. As I reported in this column four months ago, the company says that from 2002-2006 it invested $77 million in an old gold mine near the Honduran border with the encouragement of the Salvadoran government. By 2006, Pacific Rim says it had exceeded all environmental requirements at the El Dorado mine and fully expected to get the permit needed to begin

Two years later the company still doesn't have a permit, nor does it have any word from the government that it has not complied with the law. CEO Thomas Shrake says the government's "inaction" has put his company in desperate straits. So desperate that two weeks ago it filed a "notice of intent" to seek arbitration under the Central American Free Trade Agreement (Cafta) for "breaches of international and El Salvadoran law." If there is no resolution by March 9, Pacific Rim says it will proceed to arbitration and ask for monetary damages in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

That's a high price for a poor country. More expensive, however, is the lost opportunity for Salvadorans. Mr. Shrake, who is a geologist, says that El Salvador sits in the center of the Central American Gold Belt and that gold, as an engine of growth, has the potential to transform the country's economy in the same way that copper changed Chile. But Mr. Saca's government, he says, has "effectively shut down the mining industry."

Why the government has refused to act on the Pacific Rim project remains unclear, and my many efforts to get an explanation from the government have gone unanswered. Certainly Mr. Saca can't blame it on politics. Though some nongovernmental organizations have tried to block the mine, polls show that a majority of Salvadorans and politicians across party lines support mining, providing there are environmental precautions. Mr. Shrake says the government has not given him a reason for the permit denial.

Meanwhile, another mystery has gained attention in Salvador: From late September to early November, especially high volumes of Pacific Rim stock traded on the American and Toronto stock exchanges. This means that a large quantity of stock was being acquired and at a very good price; after the company's announcement in August that it had to suspend operations at El Dorado, the share value dropped 90%. This seems like a risky trade but should the permit come through the stock is likely to recover, making buyers at distressed prices very rich.

Pacific Rim is not the only company claiming its rights are being violated by Mr. Saca's administration. In November, the Italian power company Enel filed a suit against the government alleging it broke a contract that would have allowed Enel to increase its ownership in the state energy company LaGEO.

Allegations that the Saca government is violating its own laws have damaged the country's image at a time when foreign investors already are skittish due to election-year uncertainty and global economic weakness. Pacific Rim used to have 262 direct employees in Salvador. It expected the mine would create 500 direct jobs in all and another 2,500 indirectly. Instead, the company's El Salvador staff is now down to 36.

This is precisely why voters are likely to take a chance on the FMLN come election day. If they do, Mr. Funes will have Mr. Saca to thank.

Source The Wall Street Journal - writer to O'Grady@wsj.com 22/Dic /2008
Comentarios
  • Blogger Comentarios en Blogger
  • Facebook Comentarios en Facebook
  • Disqus Comentarios en Disqus

11 comments :

  1. “Central American nation, which suffered so much in the 1980s at the hands of the Soviet-backed FMLN.”

    Amigo, please use more “fairnes” both FMLN and Government Death Squads damaged peoples peace and tranquility.

    ReplyDelete
  2. hEY GRINGO, WHO TOLD YOU THAT THE majority of Salvadorans and politicians across party lines support mining?

    DO YOU THINK PEOPLE DOES NOT READ EL SALVADOR'S NEWS?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Amigos,

    The writer is not a gringo, is a gringa. But she is biased too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. if the mining company will create jobs, pay it's fare share of taxes and it complies with the environmental requirements, why not let them continue to develope this resource?? of couse we should NOT sell the mine but we should lease it. selling all of our natural resources does not benefit El Salvador in the long run.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mining would contaminate y dry our rivers. The Wall Street Journal is known by its right wing writing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh my gush! They are singing "Las Golondrinas" for ARENA! And now who is going to save us from oblivion?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Even conservative allies such as the W. Street Journal throw mud at president Saca, he is hit the bottom.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting article that many of us would like to say much more.

    But I understand that this article is writen by someone that is making relevant the issue such as Corruption or Goverment unable function due to the facts expressed in such article.

    Of course, Funes will thank saca, but not to come to power, but not authorized the Pacific Rim project.

    Not all foreign investors are good investors and to study such projects means to have better decisions for good of the people.

    OXFAM is one agency that has opossed to such bigotry from Rim to Salvadoran people.

    Thanks to Foreign Agencies as such that most of the time are better in serving Salvadoran People.


    Jose Matatias Delgado Y Del Hambre.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Why would anyone blame Chavez, Castro or Ortega if Funes wins? or Why would Funes thank Saca for wining? We will thank the Salvadoran people for self-determination and for making a decision (electing Funes) than can only be made by them (us).

    Let's simply hope that the like of the WSJ would stay out of our voting rights and individual choices.

    Carlos RR - NYC

    ReplyDelete
  10. Esta es una razon valida?? "Mr. Shrake, who is a geologist, says that El Salvador sits in the center of the Central American Gold Belt and that gold, as an engine of growth, has the potential to transform the country's economy in the same way that copper changed Chile" cuando en Chile y Peru, paises mucho mas grandes hay terribles problemas sociales, ambientales debido a las minas. Lo malo del CAFTA fue abrir las puertas a este tipo de problemas, que van a ocurrir mas tarde con los transgenicos y el agua...just wait and see...
    Wake up people!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Response from someone in EEUU (from WSJ comment section):

    http://forums.wsj.com/viewtopic.php?t=4808

    I don't expect a writer in your publication to report with true objectivity as i realize the goal of your paper is to promote free market values. I am concerned, however, by the lack of understanding, to give her the benefit of the doubt, Mary O'Grady has of Salvadorean politics. It is ludicrous to claim that Salvadoreans want to change the government due the perceived lack of economic benefit. I find it suspicious that in an article related to Salvadorean electoral politics, the fortunes of a greedy company that made the mistake of believing corrupt government officials becomes the main argument for change.

    It has always being clear that gold mining is unsustainable in such a small, environmentally damaged, and densely populated country. In case you have not done the research I will list the main reasons for you.

    • Exacerbating the existing water shortage crisis in the country: in a single day alone, Pacific Rim’s El Dorado project for example, would draw on the same amount of water used by a family in a span of 30 years.
    • Threatening food security and other economic activities: mining activities will displace more sustainable industries - such as agriculture, ranching, and tourism – that create more jobs, produce food, and benefit poor sectors of the population. Furthermore the contaminated water—even when temporarily retained in tailings ponds – poses a risk to these economic activities in a much broader area.
    • Risking people’s health: the cyanide and other heavy metals introduced by the separation process seriously endanger the lives and health of hundreds of thousands of Salvadoreans. The company's proposal to bury contaminated soil does not address long-term risks such as leeching.

    Gold mining in El Salvador would have disastrous consequences for its population and it would continue to exacerbate its already fragile ecological and social balance. That is the reason why millions of salvadoreans have very clearly expressed their discontent to the government and will continue to do so even if a left wing government takes the administrative aparattus of the state.

    Opposition Mining in El Salvador is not an ideological issue, is an issue of survival. If government officials have not issued exploitation permits is because they know that, and they also know how far people are willing to go to defend their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    ReplyDelete

Gracias por participar en SPMNEWS de Salvadoreños por el Mundo


Administración Bukele

[Bukele][grids]

Politica

[Politica][threecolumns]

Deportes

[Deportes][list]

Economía

[Economía][threecolumns]

Tecnología

[Tecnología][grids]

English Editions

[English Editions][bsummary]