ARENA, FMLN Face Off in El Salvador
By Carlos Macias
Salvadorans head to the polls on March 15 to elect their next president. Voters will choose between the governing Alianza Republicana Nacionalista (ARENA) party candidate Rodrigo Ávila and the opposition’s Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) candidate Mauricio Funes. Recent polls and international media forecast that the leftist FMLN candidate appears poised to unseat ARENA, which has held power since 1989. Ávila says that a Funes victory would bring in a government similar to that of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.
A poll conducted by Central America-based CID-Gallup released two weeks before the elections shows Funes leading the race by more than five percent over his opponent. But the election is not won yet; President Antonio Saca noted that the key to win the election remains in the hands of undecided voters, who make up as much as 20 percent of the electorate.Funes, a former television journalist, has long been outspoken critic of the government.
The FMLN nominated him in September of 2007. Since then he has attempted to calm critics who point to the leftist roots of his party. In an interview with the Honduran newspaper La Prensa, Funes said his political platform uses Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as point of reference rather than Chávez. He also said that, as president, he would not join regional agencies such as the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas if doing so would threaten bilateral relations with the United States. Ávila, a former chief of the national police, closed his campaign with a massive rally at the Cuscatlán Stadium in San Salvador shouting the slogan “Country yes, Communism No.”
In an interview with Univision’s Jorge Ramos, Ávila extolled the economic improvements gained under two decades of ARENA rule. He also defended his record as a police chief in the 1990s. Ramos also interviewed Funes a week earlier.The state of the economy and security stand as priority issues in the election. El Salvador has the second-highest homicide rate in the world after Iraq, reports the Miami Herald in an article about Salvadoran gangs.
The Economist Intelligence Unit predicts a marked slowdown in the country’s GDP growth through 2010 and warns that, “regardless of the final outcome in the presidential election, no party will have an outright majority in Congress, complicating policy implementation in the next four-year term.”The National Democratic Institute prepared a report on January legislative elections as well as the March 15 presidential elections. According to their data, ARENA had outspent the FMLN through January 18, with the former accounting for 65 percent of campaign spending and the latter just 19 percent.
In the January election, the FMLN won a plurality of votes in the Legislative Assembly by winning 35 out of 84 seats. However, ARENA won the mayoralty of San Salvador, ending over a decade of FMLN control of the capital. Some have wondered what role Washington will play in this election, given past U.S. involvement in Salvadoran politics. A Boston Globe op-ed recalls the country’s 2004 election, when the Bush administration drummed up fears by implying that an FMLN victory could result in a change in migratory status for Salvadorans living in the United States.
According to the U.S. State Department, Salvadorans working in the United States sent $3.8 billion in remittances in 2008, benefiting more than 22 percent of the population. As expected, in December the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services bureau extended the Temporary Protected Status for Salvadorans until September 2010. Still, over 200 American academics wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking for a U.S. government statement of impartiality.
Source: as-coa.org. 10/March/2009
Salvadorans head to the polls on March 15 to elect their next president. Voters will choose between the governing Alianza Republicana Nacionalista (ARENA) party candidate Rodrigo Ávila and the opposition’s Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) candidate Mauricio Funes. Recent polls and international media forecast that the leftist FMLN candidate appears poised to unseat ARENA, which has held power since 1989. Ávila says that a Funes victory would bring in a government similar to that of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.
A poll conducted by Central America-based CID-Gallup released two weeks before the elections shows Funes leading the race by more than five percent over his opponent. But the election is not won yet; President Antonio Saca noted that the key to win the election remains in the hands of undecided voters, who make up as much as 20 percent of the electorate.Funes, a former television journalist, has long been outspoken critic of the government.
The FMLN nominated him in September of 2007. Since then he has attempted to calm critics who point to the leftist roots of his party. In an interview with the Honduran newspaper La Prensa, Funes said his political platform uses Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as point of reference rather than Chávez. He also said that, as president, he would not join regional agencies such as the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas if doing so would threaten bilateral relations with the United States. Ávila, a former chief of the national police, closed his campaign with a massive rally at the Cuscatlán Stadium in San Salvador shouting the slogan “Country yes, Communism No.”
In an interview with Univision’s Jorge Ramos, Ávila extolled the economic improvements gained under two decades of ARENA rule. He also defended his record as a police chief in the 1990s. Ramos also interviewed Funes a week earlier.The state of the economy and security stand as priority issues in the election. El Salvador has the second-highest homicide rate in the world after Iraq, reports the Miami Herald in an article about Salvadoran gangs.
The Economist Intelligence Unit predicts a marked slowdown in the country’s GDP growth through 2010 and warns that, “regardless of the final outcome in the presidential election, no party will have an outright majority in Congress, complicating policy implementation in the next four-year term.”The National Democratic Institute prepared a report on January legislative elections as well as the March 15 presidential elections. According to their data, ARENA had outspent the FMLN through January 18, with the former accounting for 65 percent of campaign spending and the latter just 19 percent.
In the January election, the FMLN won a plurality of votes in the Legislative Assembly by winning 35 out of 84 seats. However, ARENA won the mayoralty of San Salvador, ending over a decade of FMLN control of the capital. Some have wondered what role Washington will play in this election, given past U.S. involvement in Salvadoran politics. A Boston Globe op-ed recalls the country’s 2004 election, when the Bush administration drummed up fears by implying that an FMLN victory could result in a change in migratory status for Salvadorans living in the United States.
According to the U.S. State Department, Salvadorans working in the United States sent $3.8 billion in remittances in 2008, benefiting more than 22 percent of the population. As expected, in December the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services bureau extended the Temporary Protected Status for Salvadorans until September 2010. Still, over 200 American academics wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking for a U.S. government statement of impartiality.
Source: as-coa.org. 10/March/2009
It is a good report on Salvadoran Politicas but far to be fair it remark what arena has been stated as inflamatory retoric that if FMLN win over the official party, El Salvador will become another Venezuela or Cuba. To assert this opinion may be wrong due to the fact that El Salvador depends more of Salvadoran remittances rather than the local economy product.
ReplyDeleteThe fear that Salvadoran FMLN eventually will win is a retoric that the Eclectic President Bush uses to fear the former administration therefore; NO SALVADORAN WILL ACCEPT AS REALITY BECAUSE THEY WILL STILL SEND REMITANCES TO THEIR BELOVE ONES NO MATTER WHAT.
YES, MORE AND MORE SENATORS ARE WORRY RATHER THE FUTURE OF REMITTANCES THE NO UNITES STATES INVOLVEMENT IN SALVADORAN DOMESTIC POLITICS AS PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS STATED RESPECT FOR SELF DETERMINATION AND RESPECT FOR THE COUNTRIES AS WELL FOR OUR NATION.
THE FEAR IS NOT A SPOT OF A SERIOUS POLITICS ALWAYS.
Jose Matatias Delgado Y Del Hambre.